Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
MacCausland v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:17-cv-10253
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 26, 2019
Uber Says Cabbie's Death Ends Unfair Competition Suit
Uber Technologies Inc. argued Thursday that a cabbie's putative predatory pricing class action in Massachusetts federal court is mooted by the death of the original named plaintiff, saying the proposed replacement cabbie agreed to arbitrate all his claims against the company.
-
April 19, 2019
Cab Driver Rips Uber's Bid To Toss Unfair Competition Suit
The death of a Boston taxi cab driver who accused Uber of predatory pricing doesn't mean his proposed class action dies with him, attorneys said Friday, as another cab driver has been named in his place.
-
February 13, 2019
Uber Wants Class Action Dismissed After Cab Driver's Death
Uber told a federal judge Tuesday that what's left of a putative class action against the ride-hailing company should be tossed after the suit's lead plaintiff, a Massachusetts cab driver, passed away and was not properly replaced within the required amount of time.
-
May 31, 2018
Antitrust Claims Tossed From Boston Cabbies' Uber Suit
A Massachusetts federal judge has dismissed antitrust claims in a putative class action by Boston-area taxi drivers, saying their argument that Uber Technologies Inc. had used predatory pricing to drive the cab companies out of the market and create a monopoly were not specific enough to proceed.
-
May 16, 2018
Boston Cabbie Fights Uber's Bid To Escape Antitrust Claims
A Boston cab driver alleging Uber monopolized the market by helping its drivers circumvent local taxi rules asked a Massachusetts federal court Wednesday to preserve his antitrust claims, saying the ride-hailing giant is trying to hold his proposed class action to an "unrealistic and legally unsupportable higher pleading standard."
-
April 26, 2018
Uber Tries To Ditch Boston Cabbie's Antitrust Claims
Uber asked a Massachusetts federal judge Wednesday to toss antitrust claims in a Boston cab driver's proposed class action alleging the ride-hailing giant monopolized the market by helping its drivers circumvent local taxi rules, saying it's implausible to call Uber anti-competitive for increasing consumer choices in a "gerrymandered" market.