February 18, 2021
A California judge has rejected arguments that JAMS took sides in a dispute involving Monster Energy when it urged the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify guidelines on arbitrator disclosure requirements, calling it "highly speculative" that the arbitration provider's position on the issue could affect its arbitrators' impartiality.
December 22, 2020
A former distributor for Monster Energy is arguing that arbitration provider JAMS violated its neutrality obligations when it supported the energy drink behemoth in its bid for the U.S. Supreme Court to revive its $3 million arbitral award, a petition that was ultimately rejected earlier this year.