Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
In re Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. Securities Litigation
Case Number:
1:17-cv-01580
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Abraham Fruchter
- Baker Botts
- Beck Redden
- Dentons
- Gardy & Notis
- Greenberg Traurig
- Kahn Swick
- Kuznicki Law
- Labaton Keller
- Levi & Korsinsky
- Pomerantz LLP
- Robbins Geller
- Rolnick Kramer
Companies
- Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. NV
- Cohen Asset Management Inc.
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 07, 2022
CB&I, Investors Reach $44M Settlement Of Nuke Biz Claims
Construction and engineering company Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. NV has reached a $44 million deal to end investors' claims that the company hid "mounting problems" that led to major losses for its nuclear business.
-
March 23, 2020
CB&I Investors Get Class Cert. Over Nuke Biz Filings
A New York federal court Monday granted class certification to investors who brought a securities suit accusing Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. of lying about the decline of its nuclear business and suffering losses as a result, according to an order.
-
June 05, 2019
CB&I Says No Class For Investors Over Nuke Biz Disclosures
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. told a New York federal court to deny class certification to investors who claim it lied about the decline of its nuclear business, arguing the investors can't connect company price swings to the alleged misstatements.