Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corporation, et al
Case Number:
4:17-cv-00285
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 11, 2019
Schwab Can't Shake Fiduciary Claim In 401(k) Plan Dispute
A participant in a Charles Schwab Corp. 401(k) plan can move forward with a breach of fiduciary duty claim alleging that the company flouted its procedures when replacing a plan fund, a California federal judge has ruled.
-
December 17, 2018
Schwab Can't Ditch ERISA Duty Claims, Participants Say
The plan participant leading a proposed Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action against Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. urged a California federal judge not to toss his breach of fiduciary and monitoring duty claims, arguing that his new pleadings showed the company engaged in flawed decision-making over the funds.
-
November 09, 2018
Schwab Wants ERISA Claims Over 401(k) Plan Nixed Again
Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. told a California federal judge that the participant leading a proposed Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action against the company failed to remedy deficiencies in his breach of fiduciary and monitoring duty allegations, urging the judge to again toss the claims.
-
September 21, 2018
Schwab Dodges Fiduciary Claims In Benefits Suit
A California federal judge has trimmed fiduciary duty and failure to monitor claims from a proposed class of plan participants accusing Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. of mismanaging its retirement savings and investment plan, but allowed prohibited transaction claims against the company to proceed.
-
January 26, 2018
4 Employment Law Developments That Flew Under The Radar
There's been plenty of action recently in federal courts recently that employment lawyers may have missed, including a judge temporarily freezing a New York City law that forces fast-food businesses to forward workers' voluntary paycheck deductions to nonprofits and Charles Schwab losing its bid to compel arbitration in a class action alleging it mishandled an employee retirement plan. Here, Law360 looks at four noteworthy developments that could have slipped through the cracks.