Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
City of Richmond v. Trump et al
Case Number:
3:17-cv-01535
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
August 22, 2017
LA Wants In On Sanctuary City Fight
Los Angeles said Tuesday it wants to jump into a fight against the Trump administration over a recent move to cut off federal public safety funding for so-called sanctuary cities, just a day after a California federal judge shot down a suit by a smaller Golden State town over the policy.
-
July 12, 2017
Feds Fight SF, Silicon Valley's Sanctuary City Suits
U.S. Department of Justice attorneys urged a California federal judge Wednesday to toss suits by San Francisco and a Silicon Valley county seeking to block President Donald Trump's executive order to withhold federal funds from so-called immigrant sanctuary cities, saying withheld funds would "not amount to very much money at all."
-
May 22, 2017
DOJ Defends Sanctuary Cities Order With New Interpretation
The Trump administration asked a California federal judge Monday to reconsider a decision blocking its executive order over withholding funding from so-called sanctuary cities in the wake of a new interpretation that narrows any affected grants to those from the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, saying the new guidance erases constitutional concerns.