Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
DAUGHERTY et al v. ADAMS et al
Case Number:
2:17-cv-00368
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Judge:
Firms
- Alston & Bird
- Baker Donelson
- Blank Rome
- Clark Hill
- Dickie McCamey
- Gray Rust
- King & Spalding
- McGuireWoods
- Meyer Darragh
- Nelson Mullins
- Schnader Harrison
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 30, 2020
LabMD Racketeering Suit Against Tiversa, Law Firms Axed
A Pennsylvania federal judge threw out LabMD's lawsuit alleging that attorneys from Pepper Hamilton and Morgan Lewis & Bockius and Dartmouth College trustees worked with former cybersecurity firm Tiversa to extort LabMD, agreeing Wednesday with a magistrate judge that the 2016 case was barred by the statute of limitations.
-
November 18, 2019
Magistrate Recommends Axing One Of LabMD's Tiversa Suits
A Pittsburgh federal magistrate has recommended dismissing LabMD's racketeering claims against cybersecurity firm Tiversa, Pepper Hamilton, Morgan Lewis & Bockius and Dartmouth College, saying the statute of limitations had expired in one of many suits over Tiversa's alleged shakedown of the lab.