Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Ketrina Gordon v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. et al
Case Number:
2:17-cv-02664
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 24, 2018
Repeat Buyers Know Candy-Box Contents, Tootsie Roll Says
Tootsie Roll Industries Inc. urged a California federal court Monday to reject a consumer's bid to certify a class of people who purchased allegedly underfilled boxes of Junior Mints and Sugar Babies, saying the majority of customers are repeat buyers who know the boxes' contents.
-
March 06, 2018
Candy Buyer Seeks Cert. In Suit Over Underfilled Boxes
A consumer suing Tootsie Roll Industries Inc. for allegedly underfilling boxes of Junior Mints and Sugar Babies urged a California federal court Monday to certify a statewide class of people who have bought the candies during the past five years.