Philadelphia Taxi Association, et al v. Uber Technologies Inc

17-1871

October 01, 2018
Justices Refuse To Hear Antitrust Claims Against Uber

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear an appeal of the Philadelphia Taxi Association's case accusing Uber Technologies Inc. of anti-competitive pricing and alleging its drivers don't comply with the regulations imposed on taxis by the Philadelphia Parking Authority.
March 27, 2018
Uber Monopoly Claims Fail In Philly, 3rd Circ. Says

A Third Circuit panel affirmed a win for Uber Technologies Inc. on Tuesday, finding that just because the ride-hailing service may have harmed Philadelphia Taxi Association's business, the group has not properly alleged Uber acted anti-competitively.
November 14, 2017
3rd Circ. Skeptical Of Philly Cabbies' Uber Antitrust Claims

A Third Circuit panel on Tuesday expressed skepticism over claims by the attorney representing a group of Philadelphia taxi drivers that Uber's entry into the city created an illegal monopoly in the vehicle-for-hire market, with multiple judges suggesting the company's arrival was good for the consumer.
August 18, 2017
Uber Asks 3rd Circ. Not To Revive Philly Cab Antitrust Suit

The Philadelphia Taxi Association should not get its antitrust suit against Uber reinstated because its alleged injuries are the result of an increase, rather than a decrease in competition, Uber told the Third Circuit on Friday.

Law360