Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Adidas America, Inc. et al v. O & K Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:17-cv-00377
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bryan Cave
- DuBoff Law Group
- Dunn Carney
- Katten Muchin
- Kilpatrick Townsend
- Lewis Brisbois
- Nixon Peabody
- Perkins Coie
- Stoel Rives
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 11, 2017
Forever 21 Supplier Settles Out Of Adidas 3-Stripe Case
Adidas AG reached a settlement on Friday with one of Forever 21 Inc.'s suppliers in a suit claiming the apparel retailer violated trademark law by using the German giant's "three-stripe" mark.
-
June 22, 2017
Forever 21 Says Adidas 3-Stripe TM Has 'No Boundaries'
Forever 21 Inc. told a federal judge Tuesday that it cannot defend against claims that it infringed Adidas AG's oft-asserted "three-stripe mark" because the shoemaker's "expansive view" of its rights means the trademark "literally has no defined boundaries."