Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Melrose Credit Union v. City of New York
Case Number:
17-1251
Court:
Nature of Suit:
-
May 02, 2018
Cabbies In Uphill Battle Against Regulators Over Uber Rules
The Second Circuit's finding that traditional taxicabs weren't unconstitutionally harmed by New York City rules governing ride-hailing services like Uber and Lyft may derail similar challenges in other cities from taxicabs seeking more hard-line rules for their new rivals, attorneys say.
-
May 01, 2018
2nd Circ. Axes Rights Challenge To NYC Uber, Lyft Regs
The Second Circuit ruled Tuesday that New York City properly justified crafting different regulations for for-hire vehicles like Uber and Lyft, rejecting a suit alleging the uneven set of rules deprived medallion taxicabs of their equal protection and due process rights.