Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Goldman v. Breitbart News Network LLC et al.
Case Number:
1:17-cv-03144
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Ballard Spahr
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Dewey Pegno
- Frankfurt Kurnit
- Jenner & Block
- Katten Muchin
- Klaris Law
- Lebowitz Law
- Mintz Levin
- Morgan Lewis
- Winston & Strawn
Companies
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Gannett Co. Inc.
- The E.W. Scripps Company
- Time Inc.
- Vox Media Inc.
- Yahoo Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 28, 2019
Time Settles Embedded Tweet Copyright Infringement Suit
Time has settled a suit in New York federal court alleging it infringed a photographer's copyright by embedding a tweet with his photograph of New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady in its online stories.
-
December 14, 2018
Top 10 Copyright Rulings Of 2018
From "Stairway to Heaven" to Fox News to an epic battle over smartphone software, 2018 saw too many important copyright rulings to keep straight. Here are the 10 biggest you need to remember, plus seven more that didn't make the cut.
-
March 20, 2018
Embedded Tweet Copyright Case Sent To 2nd Circ.
A New York federal judge has given Time Inc. and other publishers the right to file an immediate appeal from a controversial copyright ruling last month over embedded tweets, crediting their claims of "tremendous uncertainty."
-
March 12, 2018
Photog Fights Quick Appeal After Embedded Tweet Ruling
A photographer who won a controversial copyright ruling last month against Time Inc. and other news outlets over embedded tweets is fighting their bid for an immediate appeal, saying "unhappiness" with the ruling is not enough for such "extraordinary relief."
-
February 15, 2018
CORRECTED: Embedding Tweets Can Be Infringement, Judge Says
A New York federal judge found Thursday that a slew of news organizations, including Yahoo, Time, The Boston Globe and Gannett, infringed a photographer’s copyrighted picture of NFL quarterback Tom Brady when they embedded tweets containing the image within articles on their websites. (Correction: An earlier story incorrectly described the underlying actions that constituted infringement. The error has been corrected.)