Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

E.S. v. MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE et al

Track this case

Case Number:

2:17-cv-03351

Court:

Nature of Suit:

Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action, Derivative Litigation

Judge:

Katharine S. Hayden

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

August 20, 2019
Aetna Beats Class Expansion In Mental Health Coverage Suit

Aetna on Monday defeated a bid to include all of its policyholders in a putative class alleging it violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act by denying plan participants coverage for medically necessary psychiatric treatment through a "hidden" exclusion.
May 16, 2017
Marsh & McLennan Hit With Suit Over Psychiatric Coverage

Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc. was slapped Monday with a putative class action accusing it of violating the Employee Retirement Income Security Act because it denied medically necessary psychiatric treatment coverage to a benefits plan beneficiary by way of an allegedly hidden exclusion.