Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
SEC, et al v. Stanford International Bank, et al
Case Number:
17-10663
Court:
Nature of Suit:
-
October 23, 2019
5th Circ. Won't Rehear Nix Of $65M Stanford Ponzi Deal
The full Fifth Circuit on Wednesday declined to rehear an insurance dispute involving R. Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme, shooting down Lloyd's of London and a receiver who looked to challenge the panel's June order sinking a $65 million settlement.
-
August 01, 2019
5th Circ. Wrong To Nix $65M Stanford Ponzi Deal, Lloyd's Says
Lloyd's of London and a receiver in an insurance dispute involving R. Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme on Wednesday said a Fifth Circuit panel's order sinking a $65 million settlement contradicts a more recent ruling by the same court, asking the entire Fifth Circuit to hear the case.
-
June 17, 2019
5th Circ. Sinks $65M Stanford Insurance Scam Deal
The Fifth Circuit on Monday vacated a $65 million deal ending claims that Lloyd's of London and other underwriters should cover losses from R. Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme, taking issue with a provision that barred future claims against the underwriters.
-
January 03, 2018
Stanford Workers Tell 5th Circ. Underwriters Were Let Off Easy
A group of 36 former employees of Stanford Group Cos. on Tuesday asked the Fifth Circuit to intervene in litigation over R. Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme, arguing a lower court wrongly allowed underwriters to walk away with $36 million of unpaid coverage without providing them any compensation or benefit.