Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Sharp Corporation v. Hisense Co., Ltd. et al
Case Number:
4:17-cv-03341
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 29, 2017
Hisense Says Sharp Can't Appeal Remand Ruling In TM Row
Electronics manufacturer Hisense pushed back at Sharp's bid for an interlocutory appeal challenging whether a California federal court has jurisdiction over its claims that Hisense misrepresented the quality of Sharp-branded televisions, telling the court Tuesday that the attempted appeal is a move to harass the Chinese company that must be denied.
-
November 20, 2017
Sharp Seeks Pause In Chinese Co.'s Arbitration Bid
Sharp Corp. asked a California federal court Friday not to rule on Chinese electronics manufacturer Hisense's motion to arbitrate claims that it misrepresented the quality of Sharp-branded televisions, telling a California federal court it should first decide if Sharp can challenge the denial of its bid to remand the suit.
-
October 19, 2017
Sharp Can't Remand TV Quality Row With Chinese Licensee
Sharp Corp. can't get its suit against entities associated with Chinese electronics manufacturer Hisense sent back to state court, with a California federal court finding Wednesday it has jurisdiction because one of the entities that licensed the Sharp trademark and is accused of misrepresenting the quality of its televisions is owned by the Chinese government.
-
July 31, 2017
Sharp Must Arbitrate Quality Claims, Chinese Co. Says
A Chinese state-owned electronics manufacturer stood behind its bid to force Sharp Corp. to arbitrate claims that it produced Sharp-branded televisions that didn't meet quality and safety standards, contending Friday that the allegations are covered by an arbitration clause in their trademark licensing agreement.
-
July 17, 2017
Chinese Co. Slams Sharp's Tactics In Quality Claims Row
A Chinese state-owned electronics manufacturer urged a California federal court Friday to hold on to a lawsuit brought by Sharp Corp. accusing it of misrepresenting the quality of certain Sharp-branded televisions, arguing Sharp is trying to use gamesmanship to bad-mouth the company into dropping its contract.