Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
SEAMAN v. AT&T, INC. et al
Case Number:
3:17-cv-04827
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
January 02, 2019
Ex-AT&T Workers Can't Duck Arbitration After Clicking Link
AT&T on Wednesday won its bid to arbitrate individual age discrimination claims by two former company workers pursuing a putative collective action against the telecommunications giant in New Jersey federal court, with its victory turning on a hyperlink to an arbitration agreement in emails sent to the onetime employees.
-
April 25, 2018
AT&T Must Face Ex-Workers' Age Discrimination Suit In NJ
Former AT&T workers can pursue in New Jersey federal court a proposed class action alleging the company's workforce reduction plan illegally targeted older workers, as the plan affected workers in the Garden State even though the company isn't based there, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.
-
November 22, 2017
Ex-AT&T Workers Fight To Keep Age Discrimination Suit In NJ
A putative class of laid-off AT&T Inc. employees on Tuesday urged a New Jersey federal court not to toss two members' claims in an age discrimination suit, arguing that the telecommunications company wrongly asserted that their class claims have no reason to be in New Jersey.
-
June 30, 2017
Ex-AT&T Workers Bring Age Discrimination Class Action
A putative class of laid-off employees filed an age discrimination suit against AT&T in New Jersey federal court Thursday, saying the company's workforce plan discriminated against workers over 40 and misled them about their legal rights, and asked the judge to order potential class members be notified of the alleged deception.