Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Togut v. Forever 21, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:17-cv-05616
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 16, 2018
Forever 21 Dodges Discovery, Gets Tax Class Action Tossed
Forever 21 dodged a class action Tuesday after a New York federal judge ruled a putative class was not entitled to discover whether the retailer had paid collected tax revenue to the state, dismissing their suit.
-
October 18, 2017
Forever 21 Can't Dodge Discovery In Tax Spat, Customers Say
A putative class of New York consumers have fired back at a bid by Forever 21 to dodge a suit claiming the retailer charged a nonexistent sales tax on clothing purchases, saying they are entitled to discovery on whether such charges were remitted to the state.
-
September 20, 2017
Fed. Court Can't Hear NY Sales Tax Spat, Forever 21 Says
Forever 21 has urged a New York federal court to dismiss a proposed class action accusing the company of collecting sales taxes from online customers, arguing the court has no jurisdiction to hear the claims.
-
July 24, 2017
Forever 21 Faces Class Action For Charging NYC Sales Tax
A Forever 21 customer hit the retail clothing chain with a proposed class action in New York federal court Monday accusing the company of collecting sales taxes from online New York City customers whose orders should have been tax-exempt.