Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Cline et al v. Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) et al
Case Number:
6:17-cv-00313
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Baum Glass & Jayne
- Conner & Winters
- Kirkland & Ellis
- McAfee & Taft
- Nix Patterson
- Norton Rose
- Robinson Bradshaw
- Rudnicki Firm
- Ryan Whaley
- Whitten Burrage
- Yetter Coleman
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 24, 2023
Atty Fees Reduced To $39M In Okla. Sunoco Pay Dispute
Attorneys who won more than $155 million in a class action against Sunoco Inc. for withholding interest payments to landowners will be paid far less for their work than requested but still walk away with almost $39 million, according to a ruling from an Oklahoma federal judge.
-
December 09, 2020
Sunoco Can't Get New Trial In $155M Okla. Royalty Dispute
An Oklahoma federal judge said Wednesday the "reprehensible" position Sunoco Inc. laid out in an oil and gas royalty trial supported the jury's $155 million verdict and justified denying Sunoco's bid for a new trial.
-
October 09, 2020
Class Says Sunoco Rewriting History To Shake $155M Ruling
Oklahoma royalty owners accused Sunoco of twisting facts in its attempt to get a redo after a federal judge found the company owes $155 million to tens of thousands of class members for not automatically paying interest on late payments, in a blistering response to the company's motion for a new trial.
-
September 25, 2020
Sunoco Seeks To Overturn $155M Okla. Royalty Ruling
Sunoco Inc. is trying to undo a ruling that it owes tens of thousands of Oklahoma royalty owners $155 million for not automatically paying interest on late payments, requesting a new trial as it awaits a Tenth Circuit determination on the timing of its planned appeal.
-
August 18, 2020
Sunoco Owes $150M For Late Royalty Payouts In Okla.
Sunoco Inc. owes $150 million to tens of thousands of Oklahoma royalty owners after a federal court ruled that the company strategically skipped paying interest on late royalty payments, demonstrating "a reckless disregard" for well owners' rights.