Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Mona Estrada v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
Case Number:
17-2980
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 04, 2018
3rd Circ. Won't Rehear Talc Suit That Could Move To Calif.
The Third Circuit has declined to reconsider a California woman's proposed federal class action alleging that Johnson & Johnson falsely advertised its baby powder as safe, and her attorneys say they now plan to move the case to state court.
-
September 21, 2018
Consumer Seeks Full 3rd Circ. Redo Of Toxic Talc Ruling
Alleging that the Third Circuit contradicted its own prior rulings and created a split with the Ninth Circuit by dismissing a Johnson & Johnson consumer's proposed class action over talcum powder as "buyer's remorse," the customer's attorneys on Friday asked for the full court to rehear the case.
-
September 06, 2018
3rd Circ. Says 'Buyer's Remorse' Can't Revive Toxic Talc Suit
The Third Circuit on Thursday affirmed a New Jersey federal court decision dismissing a Johnson & Johnson consumer's proposed class action over the alleged health hazard associated with the company's talc-based baby powder, finding the consumer's "buyer's remorse" is not an actual injury.
-
June 14, 2018
J&J Talc Customer Paid For Risky Product, 3rd Circ. Told
A Johnson & Johnson customer urged the Third Circuit on Thursday to revive her putative class action over the alleged health hazard associated with the company's talc-based baby powder, arguing she wouldn't have purchased the product had she known it could raise her chances of getting ovarian cancer.
-
March 05, 2018
J&J Asks 3rd Circ. To End Suit Over Talc-Based Baby Powder
Johnson & Johnson urged the Third Circuit on Friday to uphold the dismissal of a proposed class action over alleged safety risks associated with the company's talc-based baby powder, arguing the lower court rightly determined the named plaintiff wasn't injured physically or economically.