Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc. v. Chicago Import, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:17-cv-07354
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Johnson & Bell
- Klevatt & Associates
- Levisohn Berger
- Leydig Voit
- Mintz Levin
- Neville Peterson
- Reed Smith
- Roth Fioretti
- Ulmer & Berne
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 17, 2018
Retailers Can't Escape Duracell's TM Suit, Judge Says
An Illinois federal judge has greenlighted Duracell's trademark suit against retailers it accuses of unlawfully selling its batteries that are not approved for sale in the U.S., finding that the nation's largest battery brand showed that the sale of "gray market" batteries would likely cause confusion among consumers.
-
October 12, 2017
Energizer Wins A Counterfeit Suit As Duracell Launches One
Energizer won a suit claiming trademark infringement against a small competitor in Illinois federal court Wednesday, while the nation's other largest battery brand, Duracell, filed suit in the same court accusing an importer of trademark violations for selling foreign batteries in the U.S.