Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
The Walt Disney Company v. AIG Specialty Insurance Company
Case Number:
2:17-cv-07598
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 18, 2018
Disney Keeps AIG Dispute Over 'Pink Slime' In Arbitration
A California federal judge Thursday stuck with his decision to allow Disney to arbitrate with AIG over $25 million in coverage toward a settlement with a beef products company over an ABC report on "pink slime," shooting down the insurer's bid to vacate his earlier decision.
-
November 17, 2017
Disney Can Arbitrate 'Pink Slime' Coverage Row
A California federal judge on Friday granted The Walt Disney Co.'s request to arbitrate a dispute over $25 million in coverage toward a settlement with a beef company over an ABC news story that dubbed the company's beef byproduct "pink slime," one day after hearing arguments on the motion.
-
November 16, 2017
AIG Says Disney Can't Arbitrate 'Pink Slime' Coverage Row
AIG on Thursday urged a California federal judge to deny The Walt Disney Co.'s request to arbitrate a dispute over $25 million in coverage toward a settlement with a beef company over an ABC news story that dubbed its beef byproduct "pink slime," saying Disney's petition fails to include the news outlet and the reporter.
-
October 27, 2017
AIG Says Disney Can't Arbitrate 'Pink Slime' Coverage Row
AIG Speciality Insurance Co. blasted The Walt Disney Co.'s efforts to force into arbitration their dispute regarding whether the insurer owes $25 million toward a settlement over news reports calling a Beef Products Inc. item "pink slime," telling a California federal court Thursday that it lacks jurisdiction and arbitration isn't appropriate.