Namisnak et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

  1. July 25, 2022

    Uber Needn't Offer Wheelchair Rides In Every City, Judge Says

    A California federal judge ruled Monday that Uber isn't obligated to provide wheelchair-accessible vehicles in two Southern cities, finding that a trio of riders didn't establish that it's a reasonable request to make of the ride-hailing company.

  2. January 24, 2022

    Tearful Uber Worker Defends Accessibility Efforts At ADA Trial

    Accessibility is not an afterthought at Uber, a tearful employee testified Monday in a California federal bench trial over allegations that the ride-hailing giant discriminates against people with disabilities by not providing wheelchair-accessible vehicles in two Southern cities, saying Uber has spent millions of dollars trying to provide accessible services.

  3. January 21, 2022

    Uber Can't Use Lyft Win To Beat Wheelchair-Accessibility Trial

    Uber can't exit a bench trial over allegations it discriminates against people with disabilities by not providing wheelchair-accessible vehicles in two Southern cities, a California federal judge ruled on Friday, saying the case is distinguishable from a recent decision in favor of rival Lyft.

  4. January 19, 2022

    Uber's 'Accessibility Problem' Goes To Bench Trial In Calif.

    Wheelchair users accusing Uber of failing to accommodate people with disabilities began a California federal bench trial Wednesday with heart-breaking memories of being stranded due to a lack of reliable transportation options, urging the judge to make Uber's on-demand ride-hailing services accessible to all.

  5. April 20, 2021

    Uber, Disabled Riders Spar Over Wheelchair Access Claims

    Uber and consumers sparred Monday over whether the ride-hailing giant is legally obligated to offer more wheelchair-accessible vehicles and should face claims in California federal court that it systematically discriminated against and failed to accommodate disabled individuals.