Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Beezley v. Fenix Parts, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:17-cv-07896
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr
Firms
- Carella Byrne
- Glancy Prongay
- Goodwin Procter
- Katten Muchin
- Levi & Korsinsky
- Levin Ginsburg
- Lubin Austermuehle
Companies
- Barrington Research Associates Inc.
- BB&T Capital Markets
- BMO Capital Markets Corp.
- Truist Financial Corp.
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 12, 2019
Auto Parts Co. Inks $3.3M Deal With Investors In IPO Suit
Fenix Parts Inc. investors have urged an Illinois federal court to approve a $3.3 million settlement that would resolve their securities fraud claims over the automotive parts reseller's initial public offering.
-
February 19, 2019
Auto Parts Co. Denied Redo On Investor Suit Dismissal Bid
An Illinois federal judge told automotive parts reseller Fenix Parts Inc. on Friday that he was not swayed by its "attempt to rehash already rejected arguments" in asking for reconsideration of his decision not to toss a proposed class action over the company's initial public offering.
-
November 02, 2018
Bumps In Discovery Not Enough To Stop Auto Co. IPO Row
An Illinois federal magistrate judge has denied motions to delay or at least refine pretrial discovery pending the potential dismissal of a case involving automotive parts reseller Fenix Parts Inc.'s allegedly misleading initial public offering.
-
August 21, 2018
Auto Parts Reseller Seeks Redo On IPO Suit Dismissal Bid
Automotive parts reseller Fenix Parts Inc. urged an Illinois federal judge Monday to reconsider his decision to let a suit it is facing over an initial public offering proceed, saying that he allowed the plaintiff investors to avoid a one-year statute of limitations using a legal principle that they never asked for and even argued against.
-
June 29, 2018
Underwriters Dropped From Investor Suit Over Auto Co. IPO
An Illinois federal judge has granted a motion to dismiss charges against the underwriters of the initial public offering for auto parts reseller Fenix Parts Co., finding that an investor's securities law claim against them over untrue statements in Fenix's registration statement were time-barred.