Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Disney Enterprises, Inc., et al v. VidAngel, Inc.
Case Number:
17-56665
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 20, 2018
9th Circ. Won't Revive VidAngel's Claims Against Studios
The Ninth Circuit on Friday denied VidAngel Inc.'s bid to revive antitrust counterclaims targeting Disney Enterprises Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC and other movie studios in a copyright suit against it, finding that the family-friendly streaming service hadn't shown a conspiracy against it.
-
August 09, 2018
Studios' Snub Shows Conspiracy, VidAngel Tells 9th Circ.
VidAngel Inc. urged the Ninth Circuit to revive the company's antitrust counterclaims in the copyright infringement suit brought by Disney, Lucasfilm and other movie studios, saying during oral arguments Thursday that the refusal of all the major studios to play ball with the family-friendly streaming service supports an inference of a conspiracy among them.
-
February 13, 2018
VidAngel Asks 9th Circ. To Revive Claims Against Studios
VidAngel Inc. urged the Ninth Circuit on Monday to revive its antitrust counterclaims against Disney Enterprises Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC and other studios in their copyright suit against the streaming service, arguing a California federal judge held its conspiracy theory to too harsh a standard.