Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Sacerdote et al v. Retirement Plan Committee et al
Case Number:
1:17-cv-08834
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 23, 2022
NYU Workers Rebut Advisory Firm's Bid To Exit ERISA Suit
New York University Grossman School of Medicine workers claiming their retirement plan was overloaded with excessive fees asked a federal judge to reject an advisory firm's bid to exit their suit, saying the firm's advice directly caused losses to the plan.
-
June 09, 2022
Judge Shoots Down NYU's Sanctions Bid In ERISA Case
A federal judge rejected New York University School of Medicine's motion for sanctions against NYU workers and attorneys behind a proposed class action alleging that the workers' retirement plan was burdened by excessive fees, rejecting the school's argument that the suit was unreasonable and brought in bad faith.
-
September 19, 2018
NYU Workers, Attys Face Sanction Bid In 2nd ERISA Suit
New York University has called for sanctions against the NYU workers and attorneys behind a now-dismissed proposed class action alleging Employee Retirement Income Security Act violations, arguing in New York federal court that their suit had been an attempt to avoid unfavorable rulings in an earlier, identical case.