Swarmify, Inc. v. CloudFlare, Inc.

  1. September 19, 2018

    CloudFlare Wants Fees, Says 'Bad Faith' IP Suit Dragged On

    CloudFlare Inc. on Wednesday said it is entitled to $200,000 in attorneys' fees for defending against bad faith litigation full of "red flags," telling a California federal judge that the tech startup Swarmify Inc. kept pursuing its trade secrets claims even after it knew in February that it didn't have a case.

  2. July 25, 2018

    CloudFlare Seeks Fees Over 'Bad Faith' Trade Secret Suit

    CloudFlare Inc. asked a California federal judge to make Swarmify pay $200,000 in attorneys' fees Tuesday, following Swarmify's voluntary dismissal of trade secret theft claims against CloudFlare earlier this month, saying the video streaming startup proceeded with its suit in bad faith.

  3. February 20, 2018

    Swarmify Can't Point To Trade Secret, CloudFlare GC Says

    During the sealed portion of a hearing last week, the video streaming startup Swarmify "was unable to articulate a protectable trade secret" stolen by CloudFlare, the company's general counsel told Law360 Tuesday, after a California federal judge said he could respond to Swarmify's public statements about the closed session.

  4. February 15, 2018

    Swarmify Says CloudFlare Stole Stream Tech After Deal Talks

    Technology startup Swarmify asked a California federal judge on Thursday to block CloudFlare from offering a streaming content service and to order the takedown of two blog posts explaining how it works, saying CloudFlare created the technology with trade secrets stolen during the companies' now-stalled acquisition talks.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!