Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Vance, et al. v. DirecTV, LLC et al
Case Number:
5:17-cv-00179
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
District Judge John Preston Bailey
Firms
- Bailey & Glasser
- Dinsmore & Shohl
- Flaherty Sensabaugh
- Gibson Dunn
- Hanna & Hanna PLLC
- Hissam Forman
- Jackson Kelly PLLC
- Mayer Brown
- Reese Marketos
- Spilman Thomas
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 25, 2023
$16.9M DirecTV Robocall Deal Gets Final OK
After nearly six years of litigation, a West Virginia federal judge has given his final blessing to a nearly $16.9 million settlement that ends claims brought by a class of people who say they were on the receiving end of unwanted calls from DirecTV.
-
June 23, 2023
Attys Want $5.9M From $16.9M DirecTV Robocall Deal
Counsel for a group of people who say they were on the receiving end of unwanted calls from DirecTV has asked a West Virginia federal judge to sign off on $5.9 million in costs and fees for their work securing the "outstanding" $16.9 million settlement.
-
August 26, 2022
DirecTV Can't Send Robocall Class Action To Arbitration
DirecTV can't force a class action suit over the company's allegedly illegal telemarketing calls into arbitration, a West Virginia federal court has ruled, finding that the satellite company waived its right to arbitration based on its prior litigation activity.
-
August 15, 2022
Robocall Row Class Rep. Fights DirecTV's Bid For Arbitration
A class representative for nearly 114,000 individuals who say they received illegal telemarketing calls on behalf of DirecTV has urged a West Virginia federal judge to deny the company's bid to force her into arbitration.
-
August 03, 2022
DirecTV Robocall Recipients Get Class Cert. In TCPA Row
A West Virginia federal judge has certified a class of nearly 114,000 individuals who claim they received unwanted telemarketing robocalls placed on behalf of DirecTV, agreeing with the plaintiffs that the dispute presents a "model case for the application of the class action mechanism."
-
June 13, 2022
DirecTV Says Robocalls Weren't Barred, Fights Class Cert.
DirecTV has asked a West Virginia federal judge to deny class certification to recipients of unwanted robocalls, arguing it was not barred from calling the named plaintiffs and the scope of the proposed class is indeterminable.
-
April 12, 2022
'No Doubt' About Cert. In DirecTV Robocall Suit, Class Says
A group of people who say they were on the receiving end of unwanted calls from DirecTV have told a West Virginia federal judge that their Telephone Consumer Protection Act suit is "about as clear-cut a case for class certification as one can imagine."
-
February 25, 2021
DirecTV Can't Shake Suit Over Robocalls To Stored Numbers
DirecTV can't escape claims that it made unwanted calls to stored numbers using an autodialer, but some out-of-state plaintiffs must exit the suit, a West Virginia federal judge ruled Thursday.
-
February 12, 2021
DirecTV Arbitration Bid In Robocall Suit 'Absurd,' Judge Says
A West Virginia federal judge on Friday again denied DirecTV's bid to compel arbitration in a suit claiming the satellite TV provider violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act with robocalls to numbers on the National Do Not Call registry, stating the arbitration provision at issue is "overbroad" and "absurd."
-
October 26, 2020
DirecTV Looks To Sink TCPA Suit After Arbitration Decision
DirecTV has asked a West Virginia federal court to toss the majority of a lawsuit claiming the satellite TV provider violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, after the Fourth Circuit ruled the suit's lead plaintiff is bound by a contract to arbitrate her claims.