Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Tesla Motors, Inc. v. Ruth Johnson, et al
Case Number:
18-1010
Court:
Nature of Suit:
3950 Constitutional - State Statute
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 05, 2018
6th Circ. Says Mich. Dealers Can't Duck Tesla Info Grab
The Sixth Circuit said Monday that three Michigan car dealerships cannot dodge Tesla's subpoenas seeking communications and testimony they offered in support of a state ban on direct-to-consumer auto sales that Tesla claims is unconstitutional, saying the district court's discovery order isn't yet appealable.
-
February 08, 2018
Dealers Slam Tesla Info Grab In 6th Circ. Direct-Sales Row
The Michigan Automobile Dealers Association told the Sixth Circuit Wednesday that Tesla's bid to grab privileged communications from three dealerships in its challenge to a Michigan ban on direct-to-consumer auto sales has sweeping First Amendment implications and that Tesla's "sour grapes" attack on the state law doesn't hold water.