Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Azar v. Yelp, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:18-cv-00400
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 30, 2023
Attys Score $7.4M In Fees Following Yelp Investor Settlement
Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP and Georgia firm Holzer & Holzer LLC will get $7.42 million for their work representing a proposed class of investors that accused business review website Yelp and its executives of mischaracterizing the growth and retention expectations of its advertising program.
-
December 19, 2022
Class Attys Seek $7.4M Following Yelp Deal Ending Suit
Attorneys for an investor class that sued Yelp on false advertising claims have asked a California federal judge to grant their request for $7.4 million in fees following a $22 million settlement deal ending the lawsuit against the crowd-sourced online review website.
-
April 21, 2022
Yelp Investors Ink $22M Deal To End Local Biz Retention Suit
Yelp investors urged a California federal court on Thursday to give preliminary approval to a $22 million deal to end their suit accusing the crowd-sourced review site of concealing an anticipated post-promotion drop in local business advertising revenue.
-
September 20, 2021
Yelp Can't Escape Investor Suit Over Local Biz Retention
A California federal judge has denied Yelp's bid to toss a proposed class action claiming the crowdsourced online review website misled investors about its advertising program with local businesses, saying there's ample evidence the site made false or misleading statements about expected revenues.
-
August 15, 2019
Yelp Investors Seek Class Cert. In Advertising Suit
Yelp investors urged a California federal court Wednesday to certify their proposed class in a suit accusing the crowd-sourced review site of hiding problems with its advertising efforts, arguing that they fulfill all of the federal requirements for certification.
-
November 28, 2018
Yelp Gets Partial Toss Of Investor Suit Over Biz Retention
A California federal judge has partially tossed a proposed investor class action against Yelp Inc., finding that some of the crowd-sourced review site’s allegedly misleading statements about its advertising program with local businesses were forward-looking while others may have been made to conceal the program’s retention problems.