Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Smith-Brown et al v. Ulta Beauty, Inc. et al.
Case Number:
1:18-cv-00610
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Access Lawyers Group
- Ahern & Associates
- Calcaterra Pollack
- Jenner & Block
- Kantrowitz Goldhamer
- McLaughlin & Stern
- Stull Stull
- Willkie Farr
- Wolf Haldenstein
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 17, 2020
Ulta Used-Makeup Suit Stemming From Tweet Fizzles
Ulta Beauty Inc. and 16 consumers have filed an agreement to permanently dismiss allegations the cosmetics giant unlawfully sold used and repackaged products, concluding a nearly three-year legal battle in Illinois federal court that began when a Twitter user claiming to be an employee detailed the alleged behavior.
-
August 07, 2020
Ulta Beats Certification Bid In Shoppers' Used-Makeup Suit
An Illinois federal judge has refused to certify 15 statewide classes over accusations that Ulta Beauty Inc. unlawfully sold used, repackaged products, saying managers implemented the company's damaged goods reduction policy too differently to create a common question over their claims.
-
August 05, 2019
Ulta Shoppers Seek 17 Class Certs. In Used-Makeup Suit
Ulta Beauty Inc. customers asked an Illinois federal judge Friday to certify 17 state-based classes alleging that the makeup retailer sold used, repackaged products, arguing that the action "easily" meets all the requirements necessary for certification.
-
September 17, 2018
Ulta Shoppers Say Risk Of Buying Used Makeup Justifies Suit
A proposed class of Ulta Beauty Inc. customers told an Illinois federal judge to reject the makeup retailer's bid to dismiss their claims the company sold used products, arguing in part that misleading customers about what they were buying is enough to establish standing.
-
August 07, 2018
Cosmetics Co. Asks Judge To Nix Used-Makeup Class Action
Ulta Beauty Inc. asked an Illinois federal judge late Monday night to toss a putative class action over its alleged sale of used, repackaged products, saying the suit lobs too vague claims on behalf of too broad a class.