Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Personal Web Technologies, LLC et al
Case Number:
5:18-cv-00767
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 16, 2023
PersonalWeb, Ex-IP Attys 'Should Be Ashamed,' Judge Says
A California federal judge slammed PersonalWeb and its former counsel during a hearing Thursday on Amazon's request for more than $5 million in fees for beating patent infringement claims, saying PersonalWeb is a "poster child for bad faith tactics" and the company and "any attorneys associated with it should be ashamed."
-
June 24, 2021
IP Forecast: Gilstrap To Hear Fight Over PTAB Reviews
U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap next week will consider an inventor group's bid to halt the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office from instituting patent reviews until the agency goes through a rulemaking process concerning when it denies reviews based on parallel litigation. Here's a look at that case — plus all the other major intellectual property matters on deck in the coming week.
-
March 02, 2021
Fenwick Lands $4.6M In Fees In Amazon-PersonalWeb IP Fight
The Fenwick & West LLP team representing Amazon in PersonalWeb's failed patent infringement dispute with the online retail giant will come away with a hefty $4.6 million in attorney fees plus an additional $203,000 in court costs, a California federal judge ruled Tuesday.