Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Pfizer Inc. v. The North River Insurance Company
Case Number:
1:18-cv-00251
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 12, 2018
Insurers' New York Pfizer Coverage Suit Bites The Dust
A New York federal judge on Wednesday declined to take jurisdiction over a massive insurance coverage fight in which Pfizer Inc. wants help with a $400 million settlement of shareholder claims over the withdrawn-from-the-market painkiller Bextra and other drugs, citing Pfizer's competing suit in Delaware filed just hours before this one.
-
July 09, 2018
Pfizer, Insurer Venue Bids Denied In Coverage Fight
A Delaware federal judge on Monday denied Pfizer's bid to remand to state court a suit against North River Insurance Co. in their dispute about coverage for a $400 million shareholder suit over off-label marketing.
-
April 30, 2018
Pfizer, Insurer Duel Over Venue For $30M Coverage Fight
Pfizer Inc. and North River Insurance Co. on Friday sparred over whether Delaware or New York is the proper venue for their dispute over coverage for a $400 million shareholder suit over off-label marketing.
-
February 14, 2018
Pfizer Says Insurers Owe $30M For Off-Label Marketing Suit
Pfizer Inc. is seeking $30 million in coverage from a trio of insurers for the settlement of a $400 million shareholder suit over off-label marketing, alleging the insurers are wrongly tying the dispute to unrelated cases, in a suit the insurers sought to remove to Delaware federal court Tuesday.