Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
United States of America ex rel. Hassan Foreman v. AECOM, et al
Case Number:
1:16-cv-01960
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: False Claims Act
Judge:
Firms
- Berger Montague
- Bloch & White
- Bragalone Olejko
- Cherian LLP
- Fitch Even
- Hecker Fink
- Nelson Bumgardner
- Paul Weiss
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
- 
						February 27, 2025
						Relator Fights Discovery Ruling In FCA Suit Against AECOMA whistleblower accusing AECOM of falsely billing the U.S. Army on a $1.9 billion contract urged a New York federal judge to rethink a decision to deny discovery requests, arguing the company improperly withheld information it's now asserting in a summary judgment bid. 
- 
						December 03, 2024
						Judge Won't Strike AECOM's 'New' Claims In Army Billing SuitA New York federal judge rejected a whistleblower's attempt to strike AECOM's purportedly new arguments in litigation accusing it of falsely billing the U.S. Army on a $1.9 billion support deal, writing "denied" in the margin of the whistleblower's request. 
- 
						November 18, 2024
						AECOM Calls FCA Suit Alleging False Army Billing 'Meritless'AECOM has pushed to end a False Claims Act suit alleging that it falsely billed the U.S. Army on a $1.9 billion support deal, saying the whistleblower who filed the suit hadn't shown that his remaining allegations were material to the government. 
- 
						November 19, 2021
						2nd Circ. Revives Fraud Billing Claim In $1.9B Army Deal SuitThe Second Circuit partially revived a whistleblower's suit alleging AECOM breached a $1.9 billion maintenance deal with the U.S. Army, finding Friday that the lower court shouldn't have considered an external document when tossing accusations of false billing practices. 
- 
						May 12, 2020
						AECOM Rips 'Confused' Whistleblower On $1.9B Army DealMilitary contractor AECOM repeatedly called a former supervisor-turned-whistleblower "confused" in his efforts to revive claims that a $1.9 billion agreement to provide the U.S. Army with transportation services was violated, after a New York federal judge already let the contractor off the hook. 
- 
						April 28, 2020
						AECOM Kept $1.9B Deal Because Of War, Whistleblower SaysA whistleblower urged a New York federal judge to revive a lawsuit against military contractor AECOM, saying the U.S. Army's decision to extend the company's $1.9 billion contract despite fraud reports did not undermine his claims since it was necessary to maintain the military's presence in Afghanistan. 
- 
						April 14, 2020
						AECOM Beats Whistleblower Suit Over $1.9B Army DealA New York federal judge has tossed a whistleblower's suit alleging that AECOM violated its $1.9 billion maintenance deal with the U.S. Army, saying that the government's knowledge of these breaches shows that they weren't significant to the contract. 
