Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Colon et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
Case Number:
6:18-cv-00515
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Akerman LLP
- Gibson Dunn
- Lento Law Group
- Saul Ewing
- Shutts & Bowen
- WilmerHale
- Wilson Sonsini
- Zuckerman Spaeder
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 02, 2020
Fla. Court Ends Suit Blaming Social Media For Pulse Shooting
Survivors and relatives of victims of the 2016 Pulse nightclub massacre failed to convince a Florida federal judge Thursday to allow them to file a fifth version of their lawsuit seeking to hold Twitter, Google and Facebook liable for allowing the Islamic State to post materials that allegedly inspired the shooter.
-
June 27, 2018
Facebook, Twitter, Google Reject Blame For Pulse Shooting
Twitter Inc., Google LLC and Facebook Inc. have asked a Florida federal judge to dismiss claims by survivors of the Pulse nightclub shootings that their online platforms are liable for the massacre because they allowed a terrorist group to post material that propelled the shooter to kill in its name.