Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
The Museum of Modern Art v. MoMaCha IP LLC et al
Case Number:
1:18-cv-03364
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 11, 2018
MoMaCha Cafe Can't Escape MoMA's TM Dilution Claim
A New York federal judge on Wednesday denied an attempt by Manhattan's MoMaCha cafe to toss a trademark dilution claim in a suit brought by the Museum of Modern Art, ruling that MoMA has shown its name is famous.
-
October 01, 2018
MoMA Wins Bid To Block Manhattan Cafe's Use Of Marks
The Museum of Modern Art has won a preliminary injunction in New York federal court to bar Manhattan's MoMaCha cafe from using its trademarks as MoMA pursues an infringement suit against the matcha Japanese tea powder venue.
-
June 05, 2018
MoMA Fights Cafe's Claim That TM Not Famous Enough
The Museum of Modern Art asked a New York federal court Tuesday to reject Manhattan cafe MoMaCha's bid to throw out a trademark dilution claim in MoMA's infringement suit against the eatery, arguing the museum's nickname, word marks and logo are indeed famous despite the cafe's contention that they are not.
-
May 22, 2018
MoMa TM Not Famous Enough For Infringement, Cafe Claims
Matcha Japanese tea powder aficionados operating Manhattan’s MoMaCha cafe urged a New York federal judge to toss the Museum of Modern Art’s claim alleging the cafe dilutes its trademarks, saying MoMa’s infringement suit fails to demonstrate its nickname, word marks and logo are truly famous.
-
May 15, 2018
Nobody Will Confuse 'MoMaCha' With MoMA, Cafe Says
A Manhattan cafe is fighting a trademark lawsuit brought against it by the Museum of Modern Art in New York federal court, arguing that MoMA’s bid to stop the cafe from using similar marks fails to show the museum will be irreparably injured or consumers will be confused by their use.
-
April 18, 2018
MoMA Claims Manhattan Cafe Is Infringing Name, Trade Dress
The Museum of Modern Art sued newly opened Lower East Side café and art gallery MoMaCha in New York federal court on Tuesday, accusing it of infringing its famous trademarked name and trade dress that date to at least 1967 and appear in exhibition communications, retail goods and its restaurant The Modern.