Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
4:18-cv-02518
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Cotchett Pitre
- Eimer Stahl
- Freed Kanner
- Garwin Gerstein
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Gross & Belsky
- Hagens Berman
- Lite DePalma
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Paul Hastings
- Robins Kaplan
- Saveri & Saveri
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
- Spector Roseman
- Strauss Borrelli
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 20, 2019
Chipmakers Urge Quick Dismissal Of Price-Fixing Suit
Samsung Electronics Co. and two other chipmakers have urged a California federal court to toss a proposed class action accusing them of fixing prices on dynamic random-access memory, saying the new complaint is just a repackaging of already-dismissed allegations.
-
September 04, 2019
Major Chip Makers Duck Antitrust Conspiracy Claims, For Now
Samsung Electronics Co., Micron Technology Inc. and SK Hynix Inc. scored a win when a California federal court threw out most of a proposed class action brought by consumers who alleged the chip makers colluded to fix prices on dynamic random-access memory, a key component in many digital devices.