Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Perrong v. Liberty Power Corp, L.L.C.
Case Number:
1:18-cv-00712
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 06, 2020
TCPA Case Put On Hold While High Court Mulls Robocall Ban
A Delaware federal judge has agreed to pause a putative class action accusing Liberty Power Corp. of blasting consumers with unwanted autodialed calls until the U.S. Supreme Court has the chance to weigh in on the constitutionality of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act's autodialer provision.
-
November 13, 2019
3rd Circ. Needn't Weigh Robocall Exemption Ax, Feds Say
The federal government is rallying against a Florida utility's bid for the Third Circuit to review a ruling that found a controversial carveout to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act's robocall ban to be unconstitutional, arguing that the holding is consistent with several other appellate decisions on the issue.
-
October 01, 2019
Del. Judge Latest To Ax Gov't Robocall Exemption From TCPA
A Delaware federal judge found the Telephone Consumer Protection Act carve-out allowing government-backed debt collectors to use robocalls is unconstitutional, echoing several recent appellate decisions that have struck the controversial provision from the law.