Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Magana v. Doordash, Inc.
Case Number:
4:18-cv-03395
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
June 06, 2022
DoorDash Misclassification Suit Shuttered In Mutual Request
A California federal judge approved a joint request by DoorDash and a worker to dismiss a suit filed against the app-based delivery service company alleging it misclassified workers as independent contractors to avoid paying business-related expenses.
-
October 22, 2018
DoorDash Driver Must Arbitrate Misclassification Suit
A DoorDash Inc. delivery driver must arbitrate his putative class action claiming the app-based food delivery service misclassified drivers as independent contractors instead of employees, a California federal judge ruled Monday, saying just because a single driver opted out of arbitration doesn't mean all drivers did.
-
September 26, 2018
9th Circ.'s Uber Ruling Applies To DoorDash Suit, Judge Says
A California federal judge appeared open Wednesday to forcing a DoorDash Inc. delivery driver to arbitrate his putative class action claiming the restaurant delivery service misclassified drivers as independent contractors, saying the Ninth Circuit's Tuesday ruling dismantling a similar action against Uber "certainly" impacts the case.