Lloyd v. Eaze Solutions, Inc.

Track this case

Case Number:

3:18-cv-05176

See also:

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Other Statutory Actions

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

James Donato

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. July 07, 2021

    Consumers Drop TCPA Suit Over Pot Co. Eaze's Texts

    Two individuals who claimed they'd received unwanted text messages from pot delivery service Eaze have notified a federal judge in San Francisco that they are no longer trying to sue the company, after previously saying they had entered mediation following a U.S. Supreme Court decision concerning the federal law that protects consumers from spam calls.

  2. January 07, 2020

    Cannabis App Blames Unwanted Texts On Innocent Mix-Up

    Marijuana delivery app Eaze urged a California federal court to toss a proposed class action claiming it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by sending unsolicited texts, arguing the "threadbare" allegations are based on inadvertently sent verification messages.

  3. April 02, 2019

    Calif. Marijuana App To Shell Out $1.75M To End TCPA Suit

    An app facilitating the delivery of recreational and medical marijuana throughout California has agreed to pay $1.75 million and overhaul its marketing practices to resolve a putative class action accusing it of violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by barraging consumers with unsolicited, autodialed text messages.