Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Brown v. Starbucks Corporation
Case Number:
3:18-cv-02286
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 04, 2019
Starbucks Evades Consumer Suit Over Labels On Gummies
Starbucks Corp.'s sour gummy candies are not misleading just because they contain the names of the fruits they're flavored by on the packaging, a California federal court has ruled, dismissing the proposed consumer class action alleging the coffee giant misled customers into thinking the candy was all-natural.
-
October 04, 2018
Starbucks Accused Of Mislabeling Gummies As 'All-Natural'
Starbucks Corp. was hit with a proposed consumer class action in California federal court Wednesday accusing the coffee giant of mislabeling its sour gummy snacks as having "all-natural" flavors and profiting off of the deception.