Rice v. National Beverage Corporation d/b/a LaCroix Sparkling Waters

  1. February 18, 2020

    LaCroix Drinkers Retract Claims Over 'Natural' Label

    Illinois consumers on Tuesday agreed to drop a proposed class action and later retracted their claims that the maker of the wildly popular LaCroix sparkling water wrongly advertised its drinks are "100% Natural" despite adding synthetic compounds used in insecticides and cancer treatments.

  2. July 12, 2019

    LaCroix's 'Outraged' Sanctions Bid In 'Natural' Suit Falls Flat

    An "outraged" yet "repetitive" sanctions bid by LaCroix accusing a proposed class of consumers of its sparkling water of "financial terrorism" over their false labeling suit fails to back up its arguments with evidence, an Illinois federal judge has said.

  3. March 19, 2019

    LaCroix Additives Need Not Be Fuel To Be False, Drinkers Say

    Consumers of LaCroix Sparkling Water urged an Illinois federal judge to deny an "unprofessional" bid for sanctions in their suit over an allegedly misleading "100% Natural" label, saying the company's contention is faulty that food additives are synthetic only if they are derived from fossil fuels.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!