Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

SC Innovations, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Track this case

Case Number:

3:18-cv-07440

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Anti-Trust

Judge:

Joseph C. Spero

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. May 01, 2020

    Uber Can't Escape Defunct Rival's Antitrust Suit

    A California federal judge denied the majority of Uber's bid to escape a defunct competitor's claims that the ride-hailing giant's predatory pricing and underhanded tactics drove it out of business, saying Friday that claims Uber's market power violates the Sherman Act can move forward.

  2. April 24, 2020

    Uber Again Faces Skepticism In Bid To Exit Antitrust Claims

    A California federal magistrate judge expressed reservations Friday about dismissing claims that predatory pricing and underhanded tactics on the part of Uber drove a ride-hailing rival out of business, saying the defunct competitor may have sufficiently pled its antitrust claims.

  3. March 04, 2020

    Defunct Rival Rips Uber's 'Quibbles' With Antitrust Suit Redo

    A defunct ride-hailing startup shot back at Uber's renewed bid to dump its amended California federal suit alleging it was driven out of business by Uber's predatory pricing and underhanded tactics, saying Uber can't "quibble" with facts that sufficiently detail its monopoly power.

  4. February 19, 2020

    Uber Aims To Dump Defunct Rival's Amended Antitrust Suit

    Uber told a California federal court Tuesday that a revamped suit from a defunct ride-hailing startup alleging Uber drove it out of business with predatory pricing and other underhanded tactics still cannot establish that the shuttered company's downfall stemmed from Uber's purported monopoly.

  5. January 21, 2020

    Uber Dodges Defunct Rival's Predatory Tactics Suit For Now

    A California federal judge on Tuesday tossed a suit from a defunct ride-hailing startup alleging Uber drove it out of business with predatory pricing and other underhanded tactics, but gave the shuttered company another shot at proving its downfall stemmed from Uber's alleged monopoly power.

  6. January 17, 2020

    Uber's Bid To End Monopoly Suit Faces Skeptical Judge

    A California federal magistrate judge expressed reservations Friday about dismissing claims that Uber's monopolistic tactics drove a ride-hailing rival out of business, saying he's disinclined to "cut them off at the pass" even though the defunct company faces big hurdles proving Uber's monopoly power.

  7. November 12, 2019

    Defunct Rival Says Uber Can't Dodge Predatory Tactics Suit

    A defunct ride-hailing startup alleging Uber drove it out of business told a California federal judge Monday that Uber must be held accountable for its anticompetitive and monopolistic tactics, insisting its antitrust suit is sufficiently fleshed out to survive Uber's dismissal bid.  

  8. July 11, 2019

    Defunct Rival's Antitrust Suit A Cash Grab, Uber Says

    A defunct ride-hailing startup suing Uber for allegedly driving it out of business is simply looking for a quick payout and doesn't have any viable antitrust claims, Uber told a California federal judge on Wednesday.

  9. May 02, 2019

    Uber Gets Quinn Emanuel DQ'd From Ex-Rival's Antitrust Suit

    Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP cannot represent a defunct ride-hailing startup in its antitrust suit claiming Uber drove it out of business, a California federal judge said Thursday, finding the firm's previous work for Uber created a conflict of interest.

  10. April 26, 2019

    Quinn Fights Uber's DQ Bid In Defunct Rival's Antitrust Suit

    Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP urged a California magistrate judge on Friday not to disqualify the firm from representing a ride-hailing startup accusing Uber of driving it out of business, arguing the case isn't similar to another lawsuit in which Quinn represented Uber.