Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
DuBuske et al v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al
Case Number:
7:18-cv-11618
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 22, 2019
Pepsi, Retirees Agree To End Battle Over Pension Benefits
Married retirees who claim Pepsi shorted them on pension benefits agreed Friday to end their proposed class action, two weeks after a New York federal judge breathed new life into their case.
-
November 08, 2019
Pepsi Retirees Get 2nd Chance At Suit Over Pension Benefits
A New York federal judge has given a proposed class of married PepsiCo retirees another shot at bringing an ERISA suit accusing the company of shorting them on pension benefits, though he refused to budge on the claims he already dismissed from the case.
-
September 25, 2019
Pepsi Won't Have To Face Suit Over Pension Payouts
A New York federal judge has tossed a proposed class action accusing PepsiCo Inc. of shorting married retirees on their pensions, finding that a provision in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act guarding against losing the right to retirement benefits didn't apply.
-
April 19, 2019
PepsiCo Retirees Fight To Keep ERISA Case Alive
PepsiCo retirees are urging a New York federal court not to toss their proposed Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action, arguing that the company is wrong to suggest that ERISA allows it to give married retirees smaller benefit payouts than single folks.