Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
in Re: Papa John's Employee and Franchisee Employee Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:18-cv-00825
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Conliffe Sandmann
- Duane Morris
- Edelson PC
- Korein Tillery
- Laner Muchin
- Lieff Cabraser
- Lowey Dannenberg
- McCune Wright
- McEldrew Purtell
- Quintairos Prieto
- Radice Law Firm
- Scott&Scott
- Seyfarth Shaw
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 27, 2023
Ex-Papa John's Manager Resubmits $5M No-Poach Settlement
A former Papa John's manager wants to assuage a Kentucky federal judge's concerns over a $5 million settlement resolving claims over "no poach" provisions in the pizza chain's franchise agreements, arguing it doesn't matter that the deal covers both managerial and non-managerial workers or that some of them signed arbitration agreements because all plaintiffs were harmed by a "uniform" wage policy and all are making the same claim with the same theory of damages.
-
September 18, 2023
Papa John's $5M No-Poach Deal Rejected, For Now
A Kentucky federal judge refused to preliminarily approve Papa John's $5 million settlement resolving worker claims over "no poach" provisions in its franchise agreements, raising concerns about the nature of a deal complicated by arbitration provisions, different types of employees and the extent of any actual harm.
-
July 28, 2022
Papa John's To Pay $5M To End No-Poach Class Action
Papa John's will pay $5 million under a proposed class action settlement to resolve claims it had "no poach" provisions in its franchise agreements, with up to $1.25 million earmarked for class counsel while class members can expect a few hundred dollars each at most.
-
October 22, 2019
Papa John's Can't Escape Proposed Class' No-Poach Suit
A Kentucky federal judge granted Papa John’s bid to arbitrate one worker’s claims over no-poach provisions in its franchise agreements, but refused to dismiss proposed class allegations over the contract terms.
-
August 15, 2019
Where Franchise No-Poach Agreements Stand Today
Washington state's attorney general is forging ahead with a campaign against no-poach provisions in franchise agreements, cutting deals last week with four more chains to eliminate the practice, but with few courts weighing in so far, it is unclear which legal standard for judging the provisions will prevail.