Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
U-Blox AG et al v. Interdigital, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:19-cv-00001
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
November 05, 2019
New License Ends InterDigital FRAND Antitrust Row
The Department of Justice won't get a chance to weigh in on the antitrust implications of InterDigital Inc.'s commitments to license its standard-essential patents on fair and reasonable terms after the patent licensing company inked a new agreement that ends Swiss technology company U-blox's lawsuit.
-
May 06, 2019
InterDigital Calls U-blox 'Unreasonable' In FRAND Fight
InterDigital Inc. fired back at an antitrust suit filed against it by Swiss technology company U-blox on Friday, saying U-blox's "unreasonable" refusal to negotiate in good faith for a license to InterDigital's standard-essential wireless patents means it isn't entitled to fair and reasonable license terms.
-
February 12, 2019
Judge Nixes U-blox Injunction Bid In InterDigital FRAND Case
A California federal judge on Tuesday denied Swiss technology company U-blox's bid for an injunction to stop InterDigital from demanding that U-blox's customers pay royalties, saying the Swiss company presented no evidence that InterDigital's proposed royalty rates were not fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory.
-
January 31, 2019
DOJ Antitrust Unit Eyes 'Troubling' Case Against InterDigital
The U.S. Department of Justice's Antitrust Division plans to get involved in a suit accusing InterDigital Inc. of violating antitrust law by seeking excessive royalties for standard-essential patents, saying the "troubling" and "extraordinary" allegations do not have a proper legal basis.
-
January 03, 2019
InterDigital Accused Of Unfair Terms For Telecom Patents
A Swiss technology company has accused InterDigital Inc. in California federal court of demanding unfairly high royalty rates for its patents, deemed essential to wireless telecommunications, violating the mobile technology company's licensing obligations and illegally monopolizing the wireless industry.