Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Superior Communications, Inc., Petitioner v. Voltstar Technologies, Inc.
-
April 27, 2020
Supreme Court Invokes Thryv In Vacating 2 Fed. Circ. Rulings
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday vacated a pair of Federal Circuit decisions allowing Bennett Regulator Guards and Voltstar Technologies to appeal whether inter partes review petitions were timely filed, in line with the justices' ruling last week in Thryv v. Click-to-Call.
-
May 14, 2019
IPR Appeals, Timing Are Settled Matters, Justices Told
There's no reason for the U.S. Supreme Court to consider a case questioning whether the decision to institute inter partes reviews can be appealed and whether IPRs can be filed more than a year after an infringement suit is voluntarily dismissed, as these are settled matters, Voltstar Technologies Inc. told the justices Tuesday.
-
March 21, 2019
Questions Over IPR Timing, Appeals Pique Justices' Interest
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday nudged Voltstar Technologies to respond to a cert petition aiming to clarify whether inter partes reviews can be filed a year after an infringement suit is voluntarily dismissed and whether institution of those reviews can be appealed.