Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Direct Lending Investments LLC
Case Number:
2:19-cv-02188
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baldwin Mader
- Barnes & Thornburg
- BDG Law Group
- Bowles & Johnson
- Bragar Eagel
- Buchalter APC
- Diamond McCarthy
- Freeman Mathis
- Garrett & Tully
- Glaser Weil
- Greenberg Gross
- Latham & Watkins
- Levene Neale
- Levine Kellogg
- Lewis Brisbois
- Milbank LLP
- Milberg Coleman
- Murphy Cooke LLP
- Nystrom Beckman
- Orrick Herrington
- Otterbourg PC
- Raines Feldman
- Reiser Law PC
- Ropes & Gray
- Shartsis Friese
- Snell & Wilmer
- Sullivan Blackburn
- Winston & Strawn
- Wolf Rifkin
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 05, 2022
Investor Attys Nab $4.65M In Direct Lending Fraud Suit
A California federal judge granted a $4.65 million award to seven law firms representing individual investors in a settlement that is part of a suit initially lodged by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission against Direct Lending Investments LLC over its founder's alleged concealment of overdue loans to inflate the value of the firm's private debt holdings.
-
August 11, 2020
Private Debt Fund Founder Arrested On Fraud Charges
The founder of Direct Lending Investments was arrested in California on Tuesday on charges of concealing overdue loans to inflate the value of the firm's private debt holdings by $300 million over four years.
-
March 10, 2020
SEC OKs $5M Loan In Direct Lending Investments Suit
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission signaled its approval of a $5 million loan agreement between adviser Direct Lending Investments LLC and some of its investment vehicles Monday, telling a California federal court that the deal would protect the interests of the parties involved.
-
March 25, 2019
SEC Says Direct Lending Overcharged Investors By $11M
On the heels of its CEO's resignation, fund manager Direct Lending Investments LLC was hit with a regulatory action on Friday alleging it charged investors for roughly $11 million in fraudulent management and performance fees.