Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Ruiz et al v. Owlet Baby Care
Case Number:
2:19-cv-00252
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
June 01, 2020
'Smart Sock' Baby Monitor Maker Beats Defect Suit, For Now
A Utah federal judge on Monday dismissed claims by parents that Owlet Baby Care Inc.'s "Smart Sock" baby monitors are defective, saying the parents' pleadings were vague and inconsistent and failed to demonstrate how the company misled them on the product's effectiveness.
-
April 15, 2019
Parents Say 'Smart Sock' Monitor Doesn't Work, Burns Babies
Two California mothers launched a proposed class action in Utah federal court on Friday alleging Owlet Baby Care Inc. misleadingly marketed a "Smart Sock" baby monitor that didn't accurately track infants' heartbeats or oxygen levels and sometimes burned their feet.