Henry v. Tyler et al

Track this case

Case Number:

3:19-cv-02869

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Stockholders Suits

Judge:

Charles R. Breyer

Firms

  1. April 03, 2020

    McKesson Again Wants Out Of Antitrust-Linked Derivative Suit

    McKesson Corp. has sought another dismissal of a shareholder derivative action accusing the company of concealing its involvement in alleged pharmaceutical industry price-fixing, telling a California federal judge that the latest complaint didn't properly address the issues in the old one.

  2. January 21, 2020

    McKesson Beats Antitrust-Linked Derivative Suit, For Now

    A California federal judge said Tuesday that the executives and directors of pharmaceutical wholesaler McKesson won't have to face a shareholder's derivative class action alleging they shirked their responsibilities by letting the company get involved in price-fixing.

  3. August 06, 2019

    McKesson Tries To Nix Derivative Suit Over Drug Price-Fixing

    McKesson Corp. and its executives asked a California federal court to toss a derivative action accusing the drug distributor's board of failing to prevent the company's alleged involvement in an industrywide conspiracy to drive up generic-drug prices, claiming that the plaintiff didn't show that the board lacked independence.

  4. May 24, 2019

    McKesson Enjoyed 'Massive Insider Trading Binge,' Suit Says

    A McKesson Corp. shareholder claims the drug distributor's directors benefited from a "massive insider trading binge" while participating in an industrywide conspiracy to drive up the prices of generic drugs, in a suit removed to California federal court Thursday.