Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

James River Insurance Company v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company Inc

  1. January 25, 2021

    Sports Co.'s Insurer Can't Duck False Ad Suit, Judge Says

    A California federal judge denied Starr Indemnity & Liability Co.'s bid to escape having to cover a suit alleging that Rawlings Sporting Goods Co. lied about the weight of its baseball bats, holding Monday that an antitrust exclusion does not apply to the underlying consumer protection claims.

  2. September 23, 2020

    Rawlings Hits Back On Bid To Deny False Ad Suit Coverage

    Rawlings Sporting Goods Co. Inc. on Wednesday took a swing at its insurer's bid to duck its counterclaims over coverage in a suit alleging Rawlings lied about the weight of its bats, saying the exclusion the insurer leans on applies only to antitrust claims, not the false advertising allegations in the underlying suit.

  3. September 03, 2020

    Insurer Slams Rawlings' Coverage Claims In Bat False Ad Suit

    Starr Indemnity and Liability Co. is pushing a California federal judge to throw out counterclaims by Rawlings Sporting Goods Co. Inc. that the insurer wrongfully denied coverage for a false advertising suit over the weight of its baseball bats, saying the suit falls under an exclusion in the policy.

  4. August 01, 2019

    Insurer Unwilling To Go To Bat For Rawlings In False Ad Suit

    Rawlings can't use insurance to defend itself in a lawsuit alleging its baseball bats are heavier than advertised because its policy doesn't cover false advertising claims, according to a lawsuit filed by the insurance company.