Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
WHAT A SMOKE, LLC v. DURACELL US OPERATIONS, INC. et al
Case Number:
2:19-cv-16657
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 01, 2024
Duracell Gets Vape Co.'s 'Optimum' TM Suit Tossed For Good
A New Jersey federal judge has thrown out a vape company's trademark suit alleging Duracell U.S. Operations Inc. infringed on its trademark for the "Optimum" brand name, saying there's no evidence showing any actual or potential confusion between the companies' products.
-
December 16, 2020
Duracell Countersues Vaping Co. For Lying To USPTO
Battery maker Duracell fired back at a vaping company that brought a trademark suit over the "Optimum" name, lodging counterclaims in New Jersey federal court that the e-cigarette maker lied to federal regulators to get its trademark registration.
-
February 03, 2020
Vape Co. Calls Duracell's Sanctions Bid 'Frivolous' In TM Suit
A New Jersey vaping company hit back against a sanctions bid Monday in its suit to stop Duracell from using the Optimum name, saying it has provided all nonprivileged documents that the battery giant has requested.
-
September 23, 2019
Vaping Co. Seeks To Block Duracell's Optimum Batteries
A New Jersey vaping company has asked a federal judge to order Duracell to stop using the Optimum name for its batteries, arguing it has held trademarks on the name for more than a decade.